text

1/27/10: P.T. Barnum day?

A thought that occurred to me last night: yesterday you had two of the most captivating and charismatic speakers of the past 25 years, Barack Obama and Steve Jobs, making highly anticipated and possibly historically notable presentations within hours of each other. Both delivered in a big way, Obama with his first State of the Union and Jobs with his long-hinted Tablet (still having trouble calling it the iPad), and both speeches were immediately dissected and argued over by warring and often irrational factions (Mac/PC and Dem/Rep; sorry Linux/Libertarian/Green). It was just an incredible day for rhetoric and vision, whether you agree with the speaker’s view of the world or not*. P.T. Barnum would be proud.

* if it’s not abundantly clear, I am a very clear supporter of the visions and capabilities of both men, even if I’m occasionally critical of execution.

text

Thank you Apple

Since I blasted Apple on the iPhone 3.1 upgrade sloppiness, it’s only fair that I applaud them when they do something well…and in this case it’s something extremely important to me.

Three days ago, my iPhone stopped switching between silent and normal mode. In silent mode, the volume remained on and the phone vibrated endlessly. Thus, I was forced to remain in normal mode, which put me at risk of having my phone go off in a meeting, at a funeral, etc.

Three days from now, the original hardware warranty on my 3G was set to expire. As you’d expect, I took the first opportunity to rush up to the Apple store and sit down at the Genius bar, hoping that it would be a quick fix (but fearing that I’d lose my phone to some convoluted repair process for a week).

Well, ten minutes after my appointment, I’m happy to say that I walked out with a brand new iPhone 3G, no questions asked. It’ll be a few hours until I can restore my contacts/apps/music from my most recent backup, but that’s certainly an enormous improvement from dealings I’ve had with other hardware manufacturers and wireless vendors (I’m looking at you, Palm, Motorola, and, yes, AT&T).

So, credit where credit is due - that was a kickass response to a problem that would have been more than a minor annoyance, given my reliance on the iPhone for business calls and email. Thank you, Apple.

8 months ago

17/11/09

quote
As more great new companies are absorbed into big old companies, a whole new generation of change is lost. They can issue press releases saying how excited they are to be able to bring their product to a whole new world of customers, and how their new suitor will bring enormous resources to bear, but we know that’s usually not really what happens. Development slows, products stall, the staff that built the great stuff leaves, and mediocrity creeps in. Not always, but usually.

The next generation bends over - (37signals) (via theopie)

I actually deleted my account when I saw the deal. I had high hopes for Mint, but Intuit’s software and general presence has always turned me off. I wasn’t entirely comfortable handing over my financial details to a third party anyway, and this was the little push over the edge. Of course, I reserve the right to change my mind if they continue to innovate and the absorption works out.

10 months ago

18/9/09

reblogged via theopie
photo Tesla Model S (front view)
ok, third crack at this, tumblr keeps eating this post for whatever reason.
The Model S looks pretty slick from the front, very futuristic. Certainly a sedan that will turn heads (well, maybe that’s mostly because people won’t hear it coming and soil themselves when they nearly walk into this lovely vehicle).
The real story here is the removable battery and fast-charge (45 minutes) capability. Tesla has been pretty adamant that fast-charge tech is immature and not yet feasible. I wonder if they’ve really had a breakthrough or if they’re pushing in all their chips in a last bid to stay solvent.
Either way, they should be applauded for bringing real EV’s to market in the insanely competitive automotive industry and quieting the critics who called them vaporware dealers. As GM and the rest of the U.S. dinosaurs come crashing to earth, it’s wonderful to see real innovation in the automotive space, particularly when it also addresses foreign policy and climate change through our dependence on foreign oil.

Tesla Model S (front view)

ok, third crack at this, tumblr keeps eating this post for whatever reason.

The Model S looks pretty slick from the front, very futuristic. Certainly a sedan that will turn heads (well, maybe that’s mostly because people won’t hear it coming and soil themselves when they nearly walk into this lovely vehicle).

The real story here is the removable battery and fast-charge (45 minutes) capability. Tesla has been pretty adamant that fast-charge tech is immature and not yet feasible. I wonder if they’ve really had a breakthrough or if they’re pushing in all their chips in a last bid to stay solvent.

Either way, they should be applauded for bringing real EV’s to market in the insanely competitive automotive industry and quieting the critics who called them vaporware dealers. As GM and the rest of the U.S. dinosaurs come crashing to earth, it’s wonderful to see real innovation in the automotive space, particularly when it also addresses foreign policy and climate change through our dependence on foreign oil.

link Cardin's Bill Ignores the Real Debate

OK, let me preface this by saying I appreciate where Cardin is coming from. His goal is to preserve the segment of the newspaper industry focused on providing information and coverage to the average citizen, ie, the local and regional papers. He states pretty clearly that this isn’t designed to provide aid to the conglomerates and national chains, though I wonder how they would differentiate.

Ignoring the obvious questions about local newspapers that are overtly political being granted 501(c)(3) status (and local newspapers are certainly NOT immune to partisanship, in some cases outFoxing Fox News), I just have to ask the obvious question: why are newspapers so important?

For a little background, I’m not exactly asking this question out of the blue. I worked for a regional newspaper in college, considered making a career out of journalism afterwards, and worked on the other side of the table in corporate communications for a global financial firm. I’m not discounting the very real contributions that under-appreciated journalists do on a daily basis; in fact, I’ve been railing for years about the hidden purges of copy editors and other back-room staff at profit-conscious newspapers. An average article in a NATIONAL paper contains a half-dozen errors that a decent copy editor would catch, yet they’ve been shuttled into early retirement or worse by publishers conscious of the low reading comprehension of the average customer. Newspapers should be improving our grammar, vocabulary, and usage, not dumbing it down - but again, that’s another debate.

No, what I’m asking here is something much simpler: why are we focusing on the distribution network (printed paper deliveries/newstand) rather than the content creators? The best-case scenario for the papers in any of these proposals is propping them up for another few years before they’re completely overtaken by digital delivery. Isn’t it time to let demand dictate the survival of the delivery network?

This would allow us to focus more energy and attention on the truly invaluable resource here, the journalists. Marginalized, under-appreciated, and forgotten, these are the men and women doing the actual work that is so valuable and necessary. Every year their numbers dwindle and the quality of the new blood diminishes as intelligent candidates take stock of a dying industry and go elsewhere. Shouldn’t we be more worried about the overall health and quality of this eternal resource than a dying business model?

Newspapers will eventually be as dead as the telegraph or the town crier. I just hope that there is still some shared journalistic knowledge to pass down by the time they are completely gone.

text

There is a lot big media can learn from the software industry

bijan:

I try not to write about why big media is broken or needs to be fixed. It’s complicated and there is huge money at stake.

But I’ve been part of a number of so many conferences, dinners and meetings on the subject lately. I just can’t keep still (read quiet). And I hear that “analog dollars vs digital pennies” thing one more time….

First a few things.

1. I don’t think big media is stupid. There are amazing businesses built from big media and I love their content.

2. I don’t believe that all big media has the same shortcomings and risk (sig difference between newspaper woes and that facing cable networks and msos)

3. i believe that content owners should be paid.

Okay, with that out of the way, let me share some thoughts.

I believe that big media could learn a lot from the software industry.

The software industry has changed tremendously over the years. It’s clear to me that the old traditional software approach (expensive, finsihed goods, big licenses, piracy risk) is long for this world. MSFT knows this and they are trying to reinvent themselves (I give them credit for that).

The busines model for great software has changed. It’s about open source (mysql), it’s about open api (twitter), it’s about professional services (red hat), it’s about advertising (google), it’s about subscription services/asp (amazon s3/ec2) and it’s about bottom up (salesforce.com).

Why did this happen? I could write a long blog post on that but there were market pressures combined with innovation. And the old model simply wasn’t going to scale.

The best part about these new models is they created bigger and new value for end users, developers and creators. New entpreneurs could build new things. New businesses could bulid new things. People & companies are making a living with these new models and it’s working.

Consider the iphone app store. if they kept it closed they would have sold less iphones and less developers would be making money.

I’m sure MSFT would’ve liked to remain in the old world forever but wishing for it just doesn’t make it so.

Big media needs to learn from this. Instead of fearing the internet they need to think about a world where every home has 100Mbps up and downstream. And my mobile device will have it too since it has wifi. And cellular will give me 10mbps downstream at some point in the near future as well.

And that is a good thing. More distribution and faster pipes is a gift.

Big media needs to take that and run. Create new forms of content, new packing, new distribution, new business models. Just like the software folks did.

Don’t hide. Time to put stakes in the ground and build the future.

ps: there is a lot the tech community can learn from big media. I’ll cover that in a future post.

Excellent points, and one more thing I would add. These big media companies are falling into the same trap that the music industry has: they can’t decide whether they want to be content producers or content distributors. NBC and Fox are trying to limit the innovation at Hulu, which has proven to be a legitimate distribution network for their content, because it overlaps with their own distribution network. If they could just concentrate on creating great content and being platform-agnostic, they would eventually find a way to make plenty of money through new channels…but they can’t, because their conglomerate business model is so dependent on the legacy distribution network, just like the record companies.

Twenty years from now, there will still be content producers and there will still be consumers. They are eternal and necessary. Distribution networks and middlemen are not, and will continually be replaced with better systems through the gradual process of evolution and the violent upheaval of revolution.

1 year ago

20/3/09

reblogged via bijan
quote
My life has been a series of well-orchestrated accidents; I’ve always suffered from hallucinogenic optimism. I was broke for more than 10 years. I remember staying up all night one night at my first company and looking in couch cushions the next morning for some change to buy coffee. I’ve been able to pay my father back, which is nice, and my mother doesn’t worry about me as much since I got married a year and a half ago.

1 year ago

8/3/09

reblogged via bijan